The trip also provided an opportunity to observe how four very different photographers interpreted the same situations. This was not just in technique and equipment chosen, but also in enthusiasm for a subject. I have to confess to being uninspired enough a couple of times that I didn't bother getting out of the car to take a shot as in my opinion, all I would end up with would be an uninteresting image, rendered so by the very strong midday sun. To note though, my pals that did make the effort made the best of a bad job and got some nice shots.
One of the highlights of the trip was the opportunity to get close up and personal with a nesting pair of wild Ospreys. This session provided a lot of food for thought in regard of wildlife photography and equipment.
Iphone photo of Osprey nest top of tree left and Osprey in tree on the right, the little dot towards the top, not the dot further up thats a Crow. |
So you can see things are pretty small (but not as small as at the nearby RSPB reserve which is really far away!
The birds are sitting in trees on a small island and luckily its easy to get down to the waters edge and set up a tripod and chair.
Cameras trained on the Ospreys |
It gave us a good opportunity to do a little comparison of the kit we were using and the outcomes.
I was using a Canon 7D, a Sigma 120 - 400mm lens and a no brand 2x converter. My buddy was using a Canon 5D mk 2, Canon 300mm f2.8l lens and a Canon 2x converter.
If we crudely priced these up then I would guess the 300mm lens alone would far outweigh the cost of my entire setup! but hey lets not dwell on that!.
So we had the same subject, doing the same things, in the same light from the same spot, the only difference, was kit and photographer. So how did we fare? Well in terms of zoom I had the advantage, as I started with 400mm at the long end, with 2x converter giving me 800mm and then a sensor crop factor of 1.6 which meant a massive 1280mm! whereas my buddy had just 600mm. I also I had the advantage of a far higher frame rate of up to 8 frames per second versus 3.9 of the 5D mkII.
Of course its not all good, at full zoom, the Sigma 120 - 400 has an aperture of f5.6, add the converter and I lose two "stops" so it becomes f11. That's pretty dark, and as we were photographing birds I wanted a high shutter speed so had no choice to up the ISO, with all the sensor noise that brings. Needless to say, my pal didn't need as much ISO though he'd too dropped two stops to f5.6.
The other main difference in this setting is mega-pixels. 7D =18mp and 5D = 21.1mp, so he can throw away 3mp of data in a crop and he'll be at my total image size, if I crop in 3mp I'm down to 15mp and much further and the image could get ragged.
So anyway lets look at the images:
Canon 7D, Sigma 120- 400 |
Exif data:1/1250 @f11 and ISO 400, 800mm
5D mk II, Canon 300 f2,8L |
Exif data: 1/1600 @ f8, ISO 400, 600mm
So there we have it. The compromises that manufacturers have to make to bring components down to affordable levels do have an impact when situations become more extreme, like the high zoom levels here. In more normal situations I'd expect the differences to be less stark. We were blessed with very good light, if it had been overcast I would have really been in trouble.
Time to start saving!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment